ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026
Adapting monocular SLAM for surface-trace free 3D registration in navigated arthroscopy.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeVideo-based surgical navigation (VBSN) relies on registering a preoperative 3D model to intraoperative data to overlay the surgical plan onto the patient's anatomy, providing real-time guidance. In current systems, registration is achieved by tracking two visual markers: one rigidly attached to the anatomy, called the anatomy marker, and another mounted on a digitizing tool. The surgeon manually collects 3D points by contacting the anatomical surface with the tool tip. This workflow requires anatomy and tool markers to be simultaneously visible and continuous tool-tissue contact, which is time-consuming and may pose risks to the patient. In an attempt to overcome these difficulties, this paper investigates the possibility of removing visual markers from VBSN.
methodsRecent monocular Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) approaches are adapted to the arthroscopic context to estimate both the camera pose and a 3D reconstruction of the scene from arthroscopic video.
resultsExperimental results indicate that the anatomy marker cannot be removed, as camera pose estimation using SLAM does not simultaneously achieve the accuracy and real-time performance required for surgical navigation. However, the digitizing tool can be eliminated, enabling contactless registration using a SLAM-based variant. Moreover, SLAM can recover both structure and motion in short time segments without the anatomy marker, allowing the surgeon to inspect regions of the anatomy without constantly maintaining the anatomy marker in the field of view.
conclusionThe proposed SLAM-based approach advances VBSN by enabling real-time, contactless registration compatible with clinical requirements, as validated in cadaveric arthroscopy experiments with registration accomplished on the fly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.