ReviewDiscover mental health2026
A Scoping Review of Interventions for the Management of Nomophobia.
Review in Discover mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nomophobia, or "no-mobile-phone-phobia", refers to the anxiety and apprehension arisingfrom the inability to have constant access to mobile phones due to various reasons. In a worldwhere digital modes of communication and socialisation are becoming the norm and people are finding it increasingly difficult to survive without their phones, nomophobia is emerging as one severe consequence. This scoping review seeks to understand the breadth of the existing literature surrounding the interventions for nomophobia, along with understanding its formats, components, scales used, theoretical framework and outcomes. The search included studies published in English from 2008 to 2025 that assessed nomophobia as an outcome using standardised measures. A total of 4,828 records were identified, of which 12 articles met the inclusion criteria. The authors adopted the JBI framework to structure the scoping review. The included studies primarily focused on the young adult population. The interventions were grouped into mindfulness-based, psychoeducation, app-based, and multi-component, combining various techniques. Most of the interventions were administered in groups and in-person formats. The Nomophobia Questionnaire (NMQ) was the most commonly used tool. Results revealed the need for designing primary and secondary preventive measures and long-term follow-ups. The review highlights the critical need for interventions focused on nomophobia since it is still nascent. The interventions are focused on limited populations and are limited in scope. Given the public mental implications of this increasingly pressing concern, this study shows the urgent need for culturally adaptable interventions to foster healthier digital habits and overall well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.