Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42062585›Full record

ReviewSkeletal radiology2026

Imaging of ewing sarcoma: an updated analysis including presenting features, prognostic imaging biomarkers, and treatment response assessment.

George R Matcuk, Tanya Tivorsak, Christopher T Watterson, Costantino Errani, Hisaki Aiba, Amandine Crombé, Paolo Spinnato

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Skeletal radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

George R MatcukDepartment of Imaging, S. Mark Taper Foundation Imaging Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd, Ste M-335, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA. George.Matcuk@cshs.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2858-0794
Tanya TivorsakDepartment of Imaging, S. Mark Taper Foundation Imaging Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd, Ste M-335, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
Christopher T WattersonDepartment of Imaging, S. Mark Taper Foundation Imaging Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd, Ste M-335, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
Costantino ErraniDepartment of Orthopedic Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136, Bologna, Italy.
Hisaki AibaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Aichi, 467-8601, Japan.
Amandine CrombéDepartment of Diagnostic Oncologic Imaging, Gustave Roussy Institute, 94805, Villejuif, France.
Paolo SpinnatoDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ewing sarcoma is a highly aggressive small round cell sarcoma primarily affecting children and adolescents. Imaging plays a central role from diagnosis to staging, treatment response assessment, and follow-up. This review synthesizes current evidence across the various imaging modalities involved at each stage of patient management, including conventional radiography, CT, MRI, and nuclear imaging, emphasizing their complementary roles. Radiographs and CT delineate bone destruction patterns, cortical breaches, and periosteal reactions, while MRI provides superior visualization of intramedullary and soft tissue extension, as well as skip lesions. Whole-body MRI and

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsSarcoma, EwingBiomarkers, TumorDiagnosis, DifferentialFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRadiomicsRadiopharmaceuticalsTreatment OutcomeBiomarkers, TumorFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsBone sarcomasBone tumorsComputed tomographyEwing sarcomaMagnetic resonance imagingNuclear medicineRadiography

Identifiers

PMID42062585
PMCPMC13369217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.