ArticleSpinal cord2026
Evaluation of sexual function and associated clinical factors in women with spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional controlled study.
Article in Spinal cord, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designProspective, cross-sectional, comparative study.
objectivesTo evaluate sexual function in women with spinal cord injury (SCI) using Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and to compare results with healthy controls. Secondary objectives were to determine prevalence of sexual dysfunction and to examine associations between sexual function and neurological level, functional independence, bladder and bowel function, and medical complications.
settingAnkara Bilkent City Hospital, Türkiye.
methodsTwenty-six women with SCI and 23 age-matched healthy controls were included. Demographic and obstetric characteristics (age, marital status, educational level, employment status, pregnancy history, number of deliveries, mode of delivery, menstrual status, and contraceptive use) were recorded. Sexual function was assessed using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). Functional independence was evaluated with the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III), and bowel dysfunction was assessed using the Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction (NBD) score. Group comparisons were performed using non-parametric tests and correlations were analyzed using Spearman correlation analysis.
resultsWomen with SCI had significantly lower FSFI total and domain scores than healthy controls (p < 0.001). Sexual dysfunction (FSFI < 26.55) was highly prevalent in SCI group. FSFI total scores were not significantly associated with neurological level or ASIA classification. FSFI scores showed a strong positive correlation with SCIM III (r = 0.77, p < 0.001) and a moderate negative correlation with NBD scores (r = -0.44, p = 0.024). Urinary incontinence was associated with significantly lower FSFI scores (p = 0.008). FSFI scores differed significantly according to bladder management method with highest scores in spontaneous voiding and lowest in indwelling catheter users (p < 0.001).
conclusionsSexual function is markedly impaired in women with SCI and is strongly related to functional independence, bladder and bowel function and urinary management than to neurological injury level, highlighting need for a multidisciplinary approach in SCI rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42062545What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.