ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2026
Drug supply shortages and their perceived consequences for patients: a questionnaire survey of German and Austrian physicians.
Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Drug supply shortages and their consequences for the medical profession: a survey in Germany and Austria.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDrug supply shortages are a recurring issue in developed countries, with consequences for patients even before the COVID-19 pandemic. Questions arise regarding the effectiveness and tolerability of alternative treatments chosen by physicians due to these shortages.
methodsTo answer these questions, a survey for practicing physicians was distributed to medical associations in Germany and Austria and conducted from November 2022 to January 2024. 895 physicians responded to the survey. The survey targeted 20 drugs with known supply shortages, namely amoxicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, penicillin V (phenoxymethylpenicillin), cefuroxime, cefaclor, erythromycin, cotrimoxazole, ibuprofen, paracetamol, urapidil, metoprolol, amlodipine, candesartan, tamoxifen, methotrexate, fluoxetine, lorazepam, human insulin, salbutamol and prednisolone.
resultsPhysicians most frequently chose a different antibacterial drug (> 60% of the physicians), while for analgesics, they more often used a different dosage form of the same drug (> 33%). For antihypertensive drugs, physicians more often chose a different dosage of the same drug. In many cases, alternative antibiotics were chosen that carried a greater risk of antimicrobial resistance than the antibiotic originally intended. The treatment success for replacing antibacterials and analgesics with a different drug was rated with 4-5 on a predefined scale of 1 (very poor) to 6 (very good) in comparison to the original drug. Using the same drug in a different dosage/dosage form was also around 4-5/6 effective.
conclusionsSupply shortages can foster antimicrobial resistance through the use of antibacterials with a higher potential for resistance. The success of alternative treatments was not always considered to be very good in comparison to the original medication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.