ArticleScientific reports2026
A comparative analysis of skin bacteria in healthy individuals through traditional cultivation and high-throughput sequencing techniques.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The human skin microbiota is intricately linked to the microenvironmental niche of its habitat. Different skin sites may harbor distinct bacterial community structures due to their unique microenvironments. To elucidate the site-specific distribution patterns of skin bacterial communities, this study employed an integrated approach combining traditional microbial cultivation methods with 16S rRNA gene high-throughput sequencing to analyze 105 skin swab samples collected from the forehead, volar forearm, and scalp of 35 healthy individuals. A total of 675 bacterial strains encompassing 41 species and 18 genera were isolated by traditional culture-based methods. Staphylococcus and Cutibacterium were the dominant genera in different skin sites, with S. capitis, S. epidermidis, S. hominis, and C. acnes identified as the predominant species. High-throughput sequencing analyses revealed that the forehead and forearm harbored similar microbiota profiles, while the scalp displayed a more distinct bacterial community characterized by reduced alpha diversity and elevated relative abundances of Cutibacterium, Staphylococcus, and Lawsonella genera. The findings from both traditional cultivation methods and high-throughput sequencing suggested that the human skin bacterial community exhibits strong site-specificity. In contrast to the significant variations observed across different skin sites, gender and age exerted minimal effects on microbiota composition. These results suggest that microenvironmental factors play a more substantial role than age- and gender-related factors in shaping the diversity and community structure of the human skin microbiota.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.