ArticleCommunications medicine2026
Systematic interrogation of drug sensitivities in melanoma reveals potent synergistic and antagonistic drug combinations with translational potential.
Article in Communications medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTargeted therapies have become mainstream anticancer treatments, although their efficacy is limited by low response rates, drug resistance, and therapy-related toxicities. Drug combinations have the potential to overcome these challenges. However, identifying effective drug combinations is a major challenge.
methodsFocusing on melanoma, we systematically interrogated drug-drug interactions to identify synergistic and antagonistic drug combinations. We screened 23 melanoma and 2 melanocyte cell lines with a library of 61 drugs belonging to 11 different drug classes.
resultsWe have identified multiple antagonistic and synergistic drug interactions. For instance, the CDK inhibitor abemaciclib strongly reduces the antiproliferative effect of nucleosides. Interestingly, this antagonistic interaction can be converted into a potent synergistic interaction by modifying the sequence of treatment; treating cells first with abemaciclib followed by nucleoside treatment results in antagonism, whereas pretreatment with nucleoside analogs followed by abemaciclib results in strong synergy. Furthermore, strong synergy is observed between combinations of Chk1 inhibitors with nucleoside analogs, especially in cell lines with defects in DNA damage response pathways, such as mutations in TP53 or CDKN2A. A combination of low doses of a Chk1 inhibitor and a nucleoside analog also synergizes in a mouse model of melanoma using female mice and significantly reduces tumor growth without noticeable toxic side effects.
conclusionsTaken together, our study underscores the importance of careful design of treatment sequence algorithms and identifies actionable drug-drug interactions for treatment of melanoma with translational potential.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.