ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Deep-learning based quantitative evaluation of postoperative atelectasis following right upper lobectomy.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Existing methods of grading atelectasis are typically subjective and not scalable. We aimed to develop an automated, deep learning-based framework to quantify and grade postoperative atelectasis. We retrospectively included all patients who underwent RULobectomy from 2008 to 2023. We trained three nnU-Net v2 segmentation models for preoperative and postoperative lobes and airways with volumetric quantification of the right middle lobe (RML), right lower lobe (RLL), and total lung volume. Atelectasis severity in the RML was independently graded using a 5-point radiological scale (none, minimal, subsegmental, segmental, lobar). The association between volume metrics with atelectasis severity and clinical outcomes was evaluated. 236 patients comprised the study cohort. Median(IQR) RML volume loss progressively increased with higher atelectasis grades, from -4.6 mL (-78.5, 59.0) in grade 0 to -317.8 mL (-440.7, -194.8) in grade 4 atelectasis (p < 0.001). Normalized RML/right lung (RL) and RML/total lung (TL) volume ratios showed statistically significant differences across the pooled atelectasis grades (p < 0.001). Normalized RLL volumes increased with worsening RML atelectasis (p < 0.001), suggesting compensatory hyperinflation. A higher ΔRML/RL [OR(95%CI): 0.89 (0.81-0.98), p = 0.01] and ΔRML/TL [0.80 (0.65-0.98), p = 0.03] were associated with reduced 1-year need for bronchoscopy. We demonstrate the feasibility and clinical relevance of deep learning-based volumetric assessment of atelectasis after RULobectomy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.