Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42062446›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Communication-related aspects drive senior patients' satisfaction with the process of decision-making in cancer therapy.

Andreas Heidenreich, Rabea Fuchshofen, Susanne Elsner, Frank Gieseler, Alexander Katalinic, Joachim Hübner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andreas HeidenreichInstitute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23560, Luebeck, Germany. andreas.heidenreich@uksh.de.ORCID 0000-0003-3279-416X
Rabea FuchshofenInstitute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23560, Luebeck, Germany.
Susanne ElsnerInstitute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23560, Luebeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7678-7071
Frank GieselerClinic for Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Luebeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6409-3822
Alexander KatalinicInstitute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23560, Luebeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0490-1554
Joachim HübnerAgency for Clinical Cancer Data of Lower Saxony, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8596-2046

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment decisions in cancer care can be life-critical and significantly affect self-determination concerns. Therefore, it is of great importance that the decision-making process is set up in the interest and satisfaction of the cancer patient. In a survey of 2,011 patients aged ≥ 50 years with breast cancer or colorectal cancer, 72.1% reported high satisfaction with the treatment decision-making process. Multivariate logistic regression identified several independent predictors of higher satisfaction: receiving comprehensive information about the illness and therapy options (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 5.37, 95% CI 3.89-8.52), strong personal involvement in decision-making (aOR 2.93, 95% CI 2.15-3.98), perceived concordance among treating physicians (aOR 2.01, 95% CI 1.49-2.71), higher self-efficacy (aOR 1.63, 95% CI 1.31-2.04), and greater social support (aOR 1.36, 95% CI 1.10-1.67). Conversely, frailty was associated with lower satisfaction (aOR 0.66, 95% CI 0.48-0.90). These findings suggest that patient satisfaction with decision-making may be enhanced when physicians provide thorough information, actively involve patients in decisions, and coordinate care consistently, while frail patients and those with low self-efficacy or limited social networks may benefit from targeted support.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsCommunicationDecision MakingNeoplasmsPatient SatisfactionAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient ParticipationPhysician-Patient RelationsSelf EfficacySurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID42062446
PMCPMC13133227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.