ArticleScientific reports2026
Rolling element bearing fault diagnosis based on modified Pufferfish optimization assisted efficient customized convolutional neural network with IMI-EMD.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep learning (DL) models have become a powerful alternative that learns the relevant features automatically from raw vibration signals without extensive manual intervention. This research addresses the existing gap in fault diagnosis by introducing a novel methodology through an efficient customized convolutional neural network (CCNN) with the modified Pufferfish optimization algorithm (MPOA) model. The proposed method includes two main phases. The initial phase involves preprocessing the input vibration signal using an improved mutual information based empirical mode decomposition technique, which effectively decomposes the signal. In the second phase, fault diagnosis is carried out using the proposed CCNN model. To improve the performance of the model, the weights of the CCNN are optimized through the MPOA. The efficient CCNN model for fault diagnosis is compared with the conventional models through a thorough evaluation using metrics like precision, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, false positive rate, and false negative rate. The CCNN-MPOA model, exhibited effective performance in fault diagnosis applications. By using a 70/30 training–testing data split, the model achieved an accuracy rate of 96.1% with a moderate computational cost of 12.22 GFLOPS along with a relatively short training time of 64.179 s. The proposed model was less prone to errors since it had a low FNR of 0.039 and an FDR of 0.037, the latter being a feature that reflected its performance in not confusing the present faults with the normal states. The computational efficiency and diagnostic accuracy of the proposed model suggest its potential suitability for future industrial deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.