ArticleScientific reports2026
Biocompatibility, inflammatory response, and antimicrobial properties of single-bottle adhesives on gingival fibroblast and human dental pulp stem cells.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate how universal adhesives affected the proliferation of gingival fibroblasts and human dental pulp stem cells by measuring cell viability at different time points: 1 min, 1 h, and 6 h. The measurement of TNF-α levels after 6 h was performed to assess any inflammatory reactions or cytokine release triggered by the materials. The antimicrobial properties against Lactobacilli and Streptococcus mutans, using the agar diffusion assay after 24 h were assessed. The single-bottle adhesives tested were: Huge Bond (Huge Dental, USA), Single Bond Universal (3 M, USA), and G-Premio BOND (GC, Japan). Huge Bond and Single Bond showed a marked decrease in cell viability after 6 h, with Single Bond exhibiting the most significant reduction (p < 0.0001). Huge Bond exhibited the highest TNF-α expression, followed by Single Bond and G-Premio. Huge Bond stands out for its superior performance against both bacterial strains (p = 0.0001). Methacrylate monomers are mostly associated with cytotoxicity if not fully polymerized because they have the ability to leach and harm dental pulp cells and gingival fibroblasts. All three materials have initial antimicrobial activity associated with the acidic monomer that was prominent with Huge Bond and G-Premio.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.