ArticleScientific reports2026
Machine learning outperforms large language models for survival prediction in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate prognostic prediction remains a critical unmet need in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). While machine learning (ML) models have demonstrated value in outcome prediction, the ability of large language models (LLMs) to perform structured clinical prognostic tasks remains unclear. In this multicenter retrospective study, 1031 patients with HCC receiving interventional therapy combined with targeted treatment were analyzed and randomly divided into training (n = 717) and test (n = 314) cohorts. Six ML algorithms were developed and compared with two LLMs (ChatGPT-4o and DeepSeek-v3). Seven variables, including age, comorbidities, albumin-bilirubin grade, tumor burden, portal vein tumor thrombus, and alpha-fetoprotein level, were identified as key predictors. In the test cohort, SVM achieved the highest performance (AUC = 0.658), followed by XGBoost (AUC = 0.654), whereas LLMs showed limited discriminative ability (AUC = 0.590-0.591; P < 0.05 vs ML). ML models effectively stratified patients into risk groups with significantly different 1-year survival, while LLM-based predictions failed to distinguish outcomes. These findings indicate that ML models outperform current LLMs in structured prognostic prediction and provide more reliable support for risk stratification and clinical decision-making in advanced HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.