ArticleScientific reports2026
Quantifying the dynamic recovery of plants through stress memory and physiological attractors.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Climate change-induced weather variability poses a growing threat to global food security, yet plant resilience is still interpreted through static and reductionist models that treat stress as independent and transient. Here, we introduce a unified quantitative framework grounded in dynamical systems theory. We formalize three novel metrics: (1) the Phenological Weather Memory Index (PWMI), that quantifies exponentially decaying stress memory across developmental stages (with a decay constant α = 0.10 determined by cross‑validation); (2) the Treatment-Weather Resonance Coefficient (TWRC), which measures the alignment of agronomic interventions with favorable weather conditions; and (3) the Physiological State-Space Trajectory (PSST), which maps multi-trait plant physiology into low dimensional attractor basins. Analyzing 288 tomato plants across 24 cultivars under hot, sub-tropical conditions (mean VPD: 2.53 kPa, 65 heat days > 35 °C), we discovered that stress memory is strongly phase-dependent, remaining minimal during vegetative growth (PWMI = 0.009) but increasing sharply during reproductive phase (PWMI = 0.574). Despite the prolonged thermal stress, 97.9% of plants converged into a stable high-yield attractor basin, revealing a fundamental nonlinearity in plant performance. This convergence was driven by dynamic recovery, defined as the capacity of certain cultivars to rapidly forget the stress memory while maintaining internal physiological flexibility. Cultivars such as 'Pony Express', combined low PWMI with effective treatment-weather synchronization, enabling stable productivity under extreme conditions. Together, these results demonstrate that resilience is not a static trait of endurance, but an emergent property arising from temporal synchronization, rapid stress recovery and stable physiological organization. By quantifying stress "forgetting curves" and attractor dynamics, this framework provides a predictive, systems-based foundation for breeding and management strategies that prioritize dynamic recovery over stress tolerance alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.