Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42062368›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Trauma and resilience among non-displaced in the early phase of the war in Ukraine.

Natalia Bekassow, Stephan Herpertz, Jan Dieris-Hirche, Kostiantyn Polishchuk, Ina Carola Otte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Natalia BekassowInstitute for Diversity Medicine, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany. natalia.bekassow@rub.de.
Stephan HerpertzDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LWL-University Hospital, Bochum, Germany.
Jan Dieris-HircheDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LWL-University Hospital, Bochum, Germany.
Kostiantyn PolishchukFaculty of International Relation, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Lviv, Ukraine.
Ina Carola OtteInstitute for Diversity Medicine, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates how civilians who remained in war-affected suburbs of Kyiv following the 2022 outbreak of war in Ukraine cope with trauma and build resilience under conditions of prolonged insecurity. Using a mixed-methods design, we combine standardized assessments of post-traumatic stress symptoms (PCL-5) with in-depth qualitative interviews conducted in suburbs of Kyiv, a region largely neglected in empirical research. Nineteen interviews were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Two contrasting case vignettes, one with the highest and one with the lowest PTSD symptom load, were selected to show variations in resilience strategies and resources. Guided by Michael Ungar's multisystemic social-ecological framework, the analysis explores how resilience unfolds across micro, meso, macro, and transnational dimensions and complements psychological assessments of trauma with a sociological perspective. Rather than viewing resilience as an individual trait, we highlight its relational, structural, and symbolic dimensions. The findings show how civilians sustain meaning and everyday stability under conditions of ongoing conflict, contributing to research on trauma recovery and resilience in active conflict settings.

Indexed as

Resilience, PsychologicalStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticWarfareAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultFemaleHumansMaleUkraineArmed conflictCopingPTSDResilienceTransnationalismUkraine

Identifiers

PMID42062368
PMCPMC13133137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.