ArticleScientific reports2026
Neural network and regression approaches for predicting bubble point pressure in oil reservoirs.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Laboratory Experiment and Multivariate Regression Analysis of NACS omega · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Petroleum engineers must accurately determine bubble point pressure (Pb) to optimize oil field development from discovery to abandonment. Errors in predicting this parameter can lead to inaccurate reservoir and production estimates. To enhance Pb predictions, A total of experimentally measured 1,161 oil samples from Egyptian oil reservoirs (604 heavy oil and 557 light oil) were used for regression analysis. In contrast, 232 datasets were used to support the artificial neural network model. Existing correlations for Egyptian crude oils of varying oil gravity demonstrated moderate accuracy, highlighting the need for improved estimation methods tailored to local reservoir conditions. This study revises existing literature correlations, which previously related Pb to reservoir temperature, flashed gas specific gravity, gas-oil ratio, and stock tank oil API gravity. In contrast, this work develops two new correlation models: one tailored for heavy oils (15.3 < API < 34.9) and another for light oils (35.6 < API < 53.1), providing improved accuracy for these distinct oil types. These models incorporate a compositional approach, emphasizing fluid composition and physical parameters for enhanced precision. The equations were revised using multiple linear regression analysis, resulting in a statistical coefficient of 99.08% for heavy oils and 96.49% for light oils. Additionally, Artificial Neural Network (ANN) models were trained on a comprehensive dataset to develop highly accurate mathematical models for predicting bubble point pressure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.