Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42062357›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Feasibility and acceptability of technology-assisted problem management plus (TA-PM+) in community settings in Pakistan: a pre-post mixed-methods study.

Maham Saleem, Shamsa Zafar, Fahad Abbasi, Hermann Pohlabeln, Siham Sikander, Daniela C Fuhr, Hajo Zeeb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maham SaleemDepartment of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS GmbH, Achterstraße 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany. saleem@leibniz-bips.de.
Shamsa ZafarFazaia Medical College, Air University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Fahad AbbasiFazaia Medical College, Air University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Hermann PohlabelnDepartment of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS GmbH, Achterstraße 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany.
Siham SikanderUniversity of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Daniela C FuhrDepartment of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS GmbH, Achterstraße 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany.
Hajo ZeebDepartment of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS GmbH, Achterstraße 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Problem Management Plus (PM+) effectively reduces symptoms of depression, anxiety, and psychological distress, demonstrating efficacy and cost-effectiveness in over 23 randomized controlled trials. However, real-world implementation through lay health workers often encounters significant challenges, particularly concerning intervention fidelity and feasible delivery. To address these challenges, Technology-assisted Problem Management Plus (TA-PM+), a digital adaptation of PM+, was co-developed. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of delivering TA-PM+ through government-employed primary healthcare outreach lay health workers known as Lady Health Workers (LHWs), in Pakistan. A pre-post, non-randomized feasibility study was conducted in Islamabad, Pakistan, involving 12 LHWs delivering TA-PM+ face-to-face to 77 women experiencing psychological distress. TA-PM+ is digital intervention designed to support LHWs in delivering five sessions of PM+, featuring psychoeducational videos for patients, automated assessments, and a guiding interface to enhance participant engagement and experience while ensuring intervention fidelity. Feasibility was assessed through session completion rates, participant retention, and qualitative interviews exploring implementation barriers and facilitators. Fidelity was evaluated using the ENhancing Assessment of Common Therapeutic factors (ENACT) checklist and digital automated session logs. Psychological distress was measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) at baseline and post-intervention. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, paired t-tests, and thematic analysis of qualitative data. TA-PM+ demonstrated high feasibility, with 92% of participants completing all five sessions. Fidelity was high, with a mean ENACT score of 48 out of 54. Over 60% of the sessions met the minimum threshold with a mean session length of 45 to 50 min. Psychological distress showed preliminary improvements, with reduction in PHQ-9 (mean reduction: 6.07, p < 0.0001) and GAD-7 (mean reduction: 5.25, p < 0.0001). Participants valued structured sessions and psychoeducational videos. Identified challenges included internet connectivity issues, difficulties aligning session times with participants' household responsibilities, and cognitive fatigue among health workers. TA-PM+ intervention delivery by government-employed primary healthcare outreach staff was feasible, acceptable, and preliminary effective in reducing psychological distress among women in a community setting in Pakistan. The digital adaptation maintained high fidelity and efficiently reduced session durations, indicating its strong potential for scale-up within primary healthcare systems. Further research is necessary to examine long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness.

Indexed as

DepressionAdultAnxietyCommunity Health WorkersFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansPakistanPatient Acceptance of Health CarePsychological DistressStress, PsychologicalCommon mental healthDigital interventionLay health workersLow-and middle-income countriesProblem management plusTechnology assisted

Identifiers

PMID42062357
PMCPMC13139419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.