Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42062312›Full record

ArticleScientific data2026

Chromosome-level genome assembly of two Chinese wild boars (Sus scrofa).

Shiyuan Wang, Zhongzhong Tu, Linmiao Li, Yibin Qiu, Shaoxiong Deng, Linhao Huang, Zhibin Cao, Tong Wang, Yu Xu, Peng Peng and 10 more

Abstract readDataset
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Shiyuan Wang *State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zhongzhong Tu *Changchun Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun, China.
Linmiao Li *Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Conservation and Resource Utilization, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Wild Animal Conservation and Utilization, Institute of Zoology, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yibin QiuState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Shaoxiong DengState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Linhao HuangState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zhibin CaoState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Tong WangChangchun Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun, China.
Yu XuCenter for Biological Disaster Prevention and Control, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Shenyang, China.
Peng PengCenter for Biological Disaster Prevention and Control, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Shenyang, China.
Shumin ZhangCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Jilin Provincial Engineering Research Center of Animal Probiotics, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Microecology and Healthy Breeding, Engineering Research Center of Microecological Vaccines (Drugs) for Major Animal Diseases, Ministry of Education, Jilin Agricultural University, 2888 Xincheng Street, Changchun, 130118, China.
Gengyuan CaiState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Sixiu HuangState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zebin ZhangState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Enqin ZhengState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zicong LiState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jie YangState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. jieyang2012@hotmail.com.
Jinping ChenGuangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Conservation and Resource Utilization, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Wild Animal Conservation and Utilization, Institute of Zoology, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. chenjp@giz.gd.cn.
Zhenfang WuState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. wzfemail@163.com.
Langqing LiuState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science and National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. langqing.liu@scau.edu.cn.

Funding

Key Technologies R #x00026; D Program of Guangdong Province project 2022B0202090002Local Innovative and Research Teams Project of Guangdong Province 2019BTO2N630National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFD1300200South China Agricultural University discipline construction and development project 2023B10564001South China Agricultural University discipline construction and development project 2023B10564003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The wild boar (Sus scrofa) is a widely distributed native wildlife species in China, where it plays an important role in diverse ecosystems. Current research on wild boars primarily focused on their geographical distribution, epidemiological investigation, and genetic relationship with domesticated pigs. However, our understanding of the genomic characteristics of wild boar remains limited. Here, we present two high-quality chromosome-level genome assemblies for Chinese wild boars, generated using PacBio HiFi and Hi-C sequencing technologies. The genome assemblies have a mean size of 2.62 Gb, with an average contig N50 of 58.0 Mb and a scaffold N50 of 140.2 Mb. Both genomes were successfully anchored to 18 autosomes and the X chromosome. The Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs (BUSCO) assessment showed a high level of genome completeness at 96.3%. On average, a total of 25,851 protein-coding genes were annotated, with a transcriptome BUSCO completeness score of 94.4%. We identified 1.24 Gb of repeat sequences, accounting for 47.31% of the genome. Among these, retroelements represent 38.26%, with LINEs being the most prevalent. The two high-quality genome assemblies presented in this study provide valuable genomic resources for future research and will support the conservation and management of wild boar genetic diversity.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, MammalianGenomeSus scrofaAnimalsChina

Identifiers

PMID42062312
PMCPMC13338218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.