ReviewEmergency medicine journal : EMJ2026
Endovascular resuscitation: an expert practice review.
Review in Emergency medicine journal : EMJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endovascular resuscitation (EVR) describes a collection of novel therapies that aim to bridge patients in shock states or cardiac arrest to definitive treatment, through a combination of haemorrhage control and mechanical circulatory support. The last half-decade has seen landmark trials report on several techniques and adoption is growing despite controversies around risk, efficacy and implementation. As leaders in resuscitation, it is essential that emergency physicians understand the principles and practice of endovascular techniques to advocate for the critically unwell patients that may benefit from EVR and be engaged in future implementation.This practice review aims to provide emergency physicians with an overview of EVR, based around case scenarios of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and non-compressible haemorrhage. We review the rationale for EVR in these conditions and describe the critical initial step of vascular access. We then describe the physiology, technique, efficacy and safety of three escalating interventions: resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta, selective aortic arch perfusion and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.