Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42061972›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2026

Economic costs of TB and HIV in high-TB-burden countries.

Manuel Barron, Stefano Bertozzi, Paul Gertler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Manuel BarronDepartamento de Economia, Universidad del Pacifico, Lima, Peru mf.barrona@up.edu.pe.ORCID 0000-0002-4752-6769
Stefano BertozziUniversity of California Berkeley School of Public Health, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1723-7085
Paul GertlerHaas School of Business and NBER, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTuberculosis (TB) remains a significant health burden in 25 low- and middle-income countries. Despite TB being more cost-effective to prevent and treat its funding is disproportionately lower than that of HIV. This study aims to assess the economic costs of TB versus HIV and evaluate the returns on investment in TB prevention compared to HIV.

methodsThe study uses a microfoundations behavioural model to estimate the economic costs of TB and HIV on households and the economy. We combine data from the WHO Global Tuberculosis Report, the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation's Global Burden of Disease dataset and Demographic Household Surveys among others. The analysis accounts for lost earnings and healthcare expenses in the short and long term.

resultsThe findings indicate that active TB cases result in significant economic losses, with US$13.7 billion in current annual losses, US$17.2 billion in future losses and US$5.7 billion in medical expenses, for a total of US$36.6 billion. In contrast, HIV causes US$5.5 billion in current losses, US$20.9 billion in future losses and leads to medical expenses of US$6.1 billion for a total of US$32.5 billion. There is substantial across-country heterogeneity in the composition of these costs.

conclusionThe economic impacts of TB are at least as large as those of HIV, with higher returns on investment in TB prevention. These results advocate for increased funding for TB relative to funding for HIV in these countries because the returns to incremental funding for TB are greater than those for HIV at current funding levels.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessHealth Care CostsHIV InfectionsTuberculosisDeveloping CountriesGlobal HealthHumansGlobal HealthHealth economicsHealth policyHIVTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID42061972
PMCPMC13141045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.