ArticleBMJ global health2026
Economic costs of TB and HIV in high-TB-burden countries.
Article in BMJ global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTuberculosis (TB) remains a significant health burden in 25 low- and middle-income countries. Despite TB being more cost-effective to prevent and treat its funding is disproportionately lower than that of HIV. This study aims to assess the economic costs of TB versus HIV and evaluate the returns on investment in TB prevention compared to HIV.
methodsThe study uses a microfoundations behavioural model to estimate the economic costs of TB and HIV on households and the economy. We combine data from the WHO Global Tuberculosis Report, the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation's Global Burden of Disease dataset and Demographic Household Surveys among others. The analysis accounts for lost earnings and healthcare expenses in the short and long term.
resultsThe findings indicate that active TB cases result in significant economic losses, with US$13.7 billion in current annual losses, US$17.2 billion in future losses and US$5.7 billion in medical expenses, for a total of US$36.6 billion. In contrast, HIV causes US$5.5 billion in current losses, US$20.9 billion in future losses and leads to medical expenses of US$6.1 billion for a total of US$32.5 billion. There is substantial across-country heterogeneity in the composition of these costs.
conclusionThe economic impacts of TB are at least as large as those of HIV, with higher returns on investment in TB prevention. These results advocate for increased funding for TB relative to funding for HIV in these countries because the returns to incremental funding for TB are greater than those for HIV at current funding levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.