ArticleBMJ open diabetes research & care2026
Tubed or tubeless insulin pumps? A retrospective real-world analysis of national French health data.
Article in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTubeless insulin pumps, introduced in France in 2016, have been associated with higher user satisfaction than tubed pumps, primarily due to reduced interference with daily tasks. Whether this translates to greater treatment persistence remains uncertain. This study evaluates persistence among people with type 1 diabetes initiating tubed or tubeless pump therapy in France.
methodsThis real-world, retrospective study used data from the French National Health Data System, a comprehensive medical claims database for the entire French population from 2016 to 2021. Treatment persistence was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox models. Changes from one pump type to another were compared across calendar years using χ
resultsAmong 1 241 624 people with insulin claims, 233 874 had type 1 diabetes. Of these, 39% (n=90 362) initiated insulin therapy during the study period; 32% started and remained on multiple daily injections (excluded), and 68% initiated pump therapy. Among pump users (n=61 251), 51% used a tubed pump, 67% a tubeless pump, and 18% initiated both types sequentially. People initiating tubeless compared with tubed pumps had higher persistence rates (unadjusted HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.61) and a 40% lower risk of discontinuation (p<0.0001), consistent with the adjusted model (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.61). Tubeless pumps were also associated with fewer changes from one therapy to another within 12 months. Treatment changes rose for tubed pump users after tubeless pumps entered the French market.
conclusionsHigher persistence and lower therapy changes among tubeless pump users underscore its sustained benefit for diabetes management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.