ArticleThe Angle orthodontist2026
Clinical implications of recall visit ligature-tie activation on alignment efficiency in premolar extraction cases: a randomized controlled trial.
Article in The Angle orthodontist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To determine whether replacing stainless steel ligature ties during recall visits accelerates anterior tooth alignment (decrowding) in extraction cases. Materials and Methods: Twenty-four patients with a Little's Irregularity Index (LII) > 4, indicated for bicuspid extraction, were randomly assigned to two groups. All patients received preadjusted edgewise appliances and 0.016 Cu-NiTi initial archwires. Group 1 had ligature ties left in place until alignment completion; Group 2 had ties replaced every 4 weeks. Decrowding was quantified, until the LII score of 0 was achieved, measured at each 4-week interval using digital calipers on study models. Outcome assessors were blinded, and intraobserver and interobserver reliability was established. Results: No significant difference was noted in overall decrowding rate between groups (P = 0.765; Group 1: 68.7 ± 29.0 days; Group 2: 65.3 ± 24.9 days). In Group 2, the maxillary arch showed a faster decrowding rate than the mandibular arch (P = 0.012; 42.0 ± 16.2 vs 77.0 ± 19.8 days). No significant arch difference was found in Group 1. Conclusions: Changing stainless steel ligatures at each recall visit offers no substantial benefit in the overall rate of anterior alignment. Scheduling recall visits every 8 weeks may be recommended for efficient time management during the alignment phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42061912What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.