Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42061912›Full record

ArticleThe Angle orthodontist2026

Clinical implications of recall visit ligature-tie activation on alignment efficiency in premolar extraction cases: a randomized controlled trial.

Jayashree Karinghat, Pavithranand Ammayappan, Sofitha Mano Dhandayuthapani, Anusha Divvi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Angle orthodontist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jayashree Karinghat
Pavithranand Ammayappan
Sofitha Mano Dhandayuthapani
Anusha Divvi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To determine whether replacing stainless steel ligature ties during recall visits accelerates anterior tooth alignment (decrowding) in extraction cases. Materials and Methods: Twenty-four patients with a Little's Irregularity Index (LII) > 4, indicated for bicuspid extraction, were randomly assigned to two groups. All patients received preadjusted edgewise appliances and 0.016 Cu-NiTi initial archwires. Group 1 had ligature ties left in place until alignment completion; Group 2 had ties replaced every 4 weeks. Decrowding was quantified, until the LII score of 0 was achieved, measured at each 4-week interval using digital calipers on study models. Outcome assessors were blinded, and intraobserver and interobserver reliability was established. Results: No significant difference was noted in overall decrowding rate between groups (P = 0.765; Group 1: 68.7 ± 29.0 days; Group 2: 65.3 ± 24.9 days). In Group 2, the maxillary arch showed a faster decrowding rate than the mandibular arch (P = 0.012; 42.0 ± 16.2 vs 77.0 ± 19.8 days). No significant arch difference was found in Group 1. Conclusions: Changing stainless steel ligatures at each recall visit offers no substantial benefit in the overall rate of anterior alignment. Scheduling recall visits every 8 weeks may be recommended for efficient time management during the alignment phase.

Indexed as

Anterior crowdingLigature tieRandomized controlled trialRate of decrowdingRecall visits

Identifiers

PMID42061912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.