ArticleThe Angle orthodontist2026
Influence of thermoforming techniques on thickness distribution of in-office aligners: a micro-computed tomography analysis.
Article in The Angle orthodontist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the impact of three thermoforming methods on the resulting thickness of clear aligners (CAs). Materials and Methods: A sample of 30 clear aligners (CAs) from the upper jaw was produced with polyethylene terephthalate glycol and divided into three groups according to thermoforming technique: pressure thermoforming (PRT; n = 10), digital air vacuum thermoforming (DVT; n = 10), and conventional air vacuum thermoforming (CVT; n,=,10). Micro-computed tomography scans and thickness values at reference points were obtained in resulting images. Intrainvestigator reliability was assessed, and statistical analysis of data was performed with nonparametric analysis of variance tests (P < .05). Results: Thickness decrease was detected among the three groups, which showed statistically significant differences. CVT presented the lowest mean thickness of 380 µm (±72.3 µm), with teeth in the anterior region thicker overall than the first molar. Also, this group had the greatest variability. DVT recorded a mean of 429 µm (±67.2 µm), with more uniform anteroposterior thickness distribution. Meanwhile, PRT had less substantial thinning with a mean thickness of 467 µm (±81.7 µm). Conclusions: Thermoforming method influences the surface thickness of thermoformed CAs. The findings provide clinically relevant evidence to guide orthodontists in selecting thermoforming protocols that ensure aligner structural stability, thickness uniformity, and more predictable force delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42061909What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.