Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42061905›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2026

Predictive multispecies constraint-based metabolic modeling: case studies and best practices.

Joshua A M Kaste, Megan L Matthews

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joshua A M KasteDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Grainger College of Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, 205 North Mathews Ave, Urbana, IL 61801, United States.
Megan L MatthewsDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Grainger College of Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, 205 North Mathews Ave, Urbana, IL 61801, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5513-9320

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The last decade has seen a proliferation of studies and techniques for the modeling and analysis of metabolic interactions between distinct species, including microbes, plants, mice, and humans. Many studies in this area are explanatory, but a subset present predictive models aimed at either achieving specific biotechnological aims or furthering our understanding of the biological systems in question. Recent work suggests that the analysis frameworks and models that have been developed in the area of microbiome research are unreliable for accurately characterizing species-to-species interactions. In light of this development, the development of this subfield of metabolic modeling and its latest stumbling block are put into historical context. Several case studies of validated and predictive multispecies constraint-based metabolic models are then discussed. From these case studies, general principles are extracted that readers and practitioners in this area may find useful for evaluating and carrying out future multispecies metabolic modeling.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsHumansMetabolic Networks and PathwaysMiceMicrobiotaconstraint-based modelingflux balance analysismetabolic modelingmicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID42061905
PMCPMC13132607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.