ArticlePoultry science2026
Two-stage acoustic detection and fine-grained classification of laying-hen vocalizations for heat-stress monitoring.
Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heat stress is a critical environmental factor limiting the production and welfare of laying hens, yet continuous, non-contact monitoring at the flock level remains challenging. This study presents a heat stress assessment framework based on acoustic biomarkers, transitioning the monitoring emphasis from sporadic anomalous noises to detailed identification and intra-class analysis of typical vocalizations. Twenty healthy Jingfen 6 laying hens were randomly assigned to a control group (22 °C, 60% RH, n = 10) and a heat stress group (short-term heat exposure from 12:00 to 14:00 at 30-32 °C, 75-85% RH, THI ≥ 81, n = 10). The experiment was conducted over five consecutive days. Prior to the formal experiment, vocal activity rate (VAR) under normal temperature conditions was measured to characterize daily vocalization patterns, and a fixed analysis window (12:00 to 14:00) was subsequently selected. A two-stage automatic analysis pipeline was developed for continuous audio recordings. Vocal segments were detected by energy-based voice activity detection (VAD) and filtered by a binary classifier. The confirmed vocalizations were further classified into five categories by a dual-branch convolutional neural network (CNN) integrating basic acoustic features, with low-confidence outputs assigned to an "Others" category. The model achieved an accuracy of 97.58% (macro-F1 = 97.38%) for the binary classification task and 94.77% (macro-F1 = 94.54%) for the five-class task. Under heat stress, total vocal counts were higher during the first three days and declined during the final two days, while the control group remained stable. The proportion of vocalizations classified as "Others" was significantly higher in the heat stress group (P < 0.01), while the five predefined types showed no significant differences. Within-category acoustic analysis revealed shorter vocalization durations in the C1 and "Others" group (P < 0.05), and reduced pitch variability in C5 (F0 IQR, P < 0.05). These findings suggest that both vocal composition and intra-pattern acoustic features respond to thermal stress, providing preliminary evidence for the potential of structured acoustic monitoring as a non-contact approach for heat stress assessment in laying hens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.