ArticlePoultry science2026
Competitive exclusion modulates broiler microbiota structure and microbial interaction networks.
Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Competitive exclusion (CE) strategies represent a promising complementary approach to control foodborne pathogens in poultry production by modulating gut microbiota assembly. This field study evaluated the impact of a CE intervention applied at chick placement on cloacal microbiota temporal development, structure, and pathogen integration in commercial broiler chickens. Fifteen broiler farms with a history of Salmonella Infantis persistence were enrolled, including CE-treated farms and untreated controls. Cloacal samples were collected at 7, 18, 31, and 42 days of age and analyzed by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Microbiota dynamics were evaluated through diversity metrics, differential abundance analysis, and microbial association network inference. CE treatment significantly altered microbiota composition and structure throughout the production cycle. Treated flocks showed a progressive increase in microbial richness and Shannon diversity from day 18 onward, while evenness remained largely unaffected. Beta-diversity analyses revealed persistent separation between treated and Un-Treated communities at all time points, indicating long-lasting treatment effects. Differential abundance analysis highlighted enrichment of beneficial genera, including Lactobacillus, Faecalicoccus, Roseburia, and Butyricimonas, in treated birds, whereas untreated flocks showed higher relative abundances of Campylobacter and other taxa associated with unstable community dynamics. Microbial network analysis revealed marked treatment-dependent differences in community organization. CE-treated networks exhibited higher modularity and edge density, suggesting increased structural complexity and potential resilience. Notably, Campylobacter showed strong early network integration and hub-like behaviour in untreated birds, while being completely disconnected in treated flocks at early life stages, indicating reduced ecological embedding. Overall, these findings demonstrate that competitive exclusion modulates broiler microbiota not only at the compositional level but also through restructuring microbial interaction networks. Early-life microbiota modulation appears to constrain pathogen ecological integration, providing a mechanistic framework for microbiota-driven control strategies under commercial poultry production conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.