Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42061046›Full record

ArticleTranslational oncology2026

Growth hormone receptor antagonism improves tumoral chemo-immunotherapy response in a mouse model of lung cancer.

Arshad Ahmad, Reetobrata Basu, Caden Fyffe, Reece Geiger, Christopher Walsh, Farrah N Brown, Badra Bashir, Amrutha Varshini Alur, Edward List, Darlene Berryman and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Arshad AhmadInstitute for Molecular Medicine and Aging, Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA; Translational Biomedical Sciences Program, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA.
Reetobrata BasuInstitute for Molecular Medicine and Aging, Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA; Diabetes Institute, Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA.
Caden FyffeInstitute for Molecular Medicine and Aging, Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA; Department of Biological Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA.
Reece GeigerInstitute for Molecular Medicine and Aging, Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA; Department of Biological Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA.
Christopher WalshInstitute for Molecular Medicine and Aging, Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA.
Farrah N BrownInstitute for Molecular Medicine and Aging, Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA; Translational Biomedical Sciences Program, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA.
Badra BashirInstitute for Molecular Medicine and Aging, Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA; Translational Biomedical Sciences Program, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA.
Amrutha Varshini AlurInstitute for Molecular Medicine and Aging, Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA.
Edward ListInstitute for Molecular Medicine and Aging, Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA.
Darlene BerrymanInstitute for Molecular Medicine and Aging, Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA; Translational Biomedical Sciences Program, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA; Diabetes Institute, Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA.
Sebastian J C M M NeggersDepartment of Medicine, Endocrinology, Erasmus Medical Centre, 3015 GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
John J KopchickInstitute for Molecular Medicine and Aging, Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA; Translational Biomedical Sciences Program, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA; Diabetes Institute, Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA. Electronic address: kopchick@ohio.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the clinical success of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), most patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) fail to achieve durable responses due to intrinsic and acquired resistance. Growth hormone (GH) receptor (GHR) signaling has been implicated in tumor progression and therapy resistance, but its role in shaping anti-tumor immunity and chemo-immunotherapy response in NSCLC is unknown. To address this, syngeneic murine lung tumors were established in wild-type (WT) and GH antagonist transgenic (GHA) mice and treated with cisplatin, anti-PD-1 antibody, or their combination. Additionally, tumor growth was monitored longitudinally, while systemic and intratumoral insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels were quantified by ELISA. Tumor tissues were further analyzed by western blotting to assess immune checkpoint molecules, chemokine signaling components, and mediators of therapeutic resistance, and fibrotic remodeling was quantified using a hydroxyproline assay. High tumoral GHR expression was positively correlated with transcriptional signatures of therapy resistance, including ABC transporters, EMT markers, and ECM remodeling factors, and inversely associated with immune activation pathways. However, GHR antagonism in combination with cisplatin and anti-PD-1 therapy significantly suppressed tumor growth and enhanced therapeutic efficacy. Importantly, the combination of GHR blockade selectively increased PD-L1, PD-L2, and PD-1 expression, enhanced CXCL10-CXCR3 signaling, and downregulated the mediators of tumoral drug resistance and stromal remodeling. Therefore, we present the first indications that GHR signaling promotes immune suppression, therapy resistance, and fibrotic remodeling in NSCLC and support pharmacologic GHR antagonism as a novel strategy to sensitize tumors to chemo-immunotherapy.

Indexed as

ChemotherapyGrowth hormone receptorImmunotherapyNSCLCPegvisomant

Identifiers

PMID42061046
PMCPMC13141460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.