Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42060934›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026

Relationship Between Online Health Information Acquisition and Shared Decision-Making Among Patients With Diabetes: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

Yue Ming, Miriam L Matteson, Yao Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yue MingRudolph Matas Library of the Health Sciences, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5682-9817
Miriam L MattesonCollege of Communication and Information, Kent State University, Kent, OH, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5001-8378
Yao ZhangDepartment of Information Resource Management, School of Information and Communication, Nankai University, 38 Tongyan Road, Jinnan District, Tianjin, 300350, China, 86 22-23506326.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1547-3022

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Shared decision-making allows patients and clinicians to make decisions together to help determine the most appropriate option. Patients need comprehensive health information to participate and evaluate different options during the shared decision-making process. Patients with diabetes need to constantly monitor their health status. They experience an array of health information needs during their ongoing health management. Online health information acquisition is a common behavior among patients with diabetes, and online information can impact the interaction between patients with diabetes and health care providers. Objective: This study explored the relationship between 2 types of online health information acquisition behavior (active online health information seeking and incidental online health information acquisition) and shared decision-making. It also investigated the mediating role of eHealth literacy during the information acquisition process among US patients with diabetes aged 18 to 44 years. Methods: Participants were patients with diabetes aged 18 to 44 years in the United States and were recruited by a survey company, Centiment. The sampling process matched the national distribution of gender and age in the United States. An online survey questionnaire was distributed through Qualtrics. A total of 558 valid responses were collected. The average age of the sample was 35.91 (SD 6.04) years. Among the sample, 260 participants were men, 291 participants were women, and 7 participants identified their gender as other. Bivariate analyses and partial least squares structural equation modeling were used for data analysis. All data analyses were performed in R. Results: The prevalences of active online health information seeking (mean 3.97, SD 0.78) and incidental online health information acquisition (mean 4.27, SD 0.78) were high among participants. Education was a key factor related to eHealth literacy (P<.001) and shared decision-making (P<.001). Model testing indicated that active online health information seeking was related to eHealth literacy (β=.192, 95% CI .067-.320) and shared decision-making (β=.234, 95% CI .123-.346). Incidental online health information acquisition was related to eHealth literacy (β=.335, 95% CI .205-.461). eHealth literacy was related to shared decision-making (β=.441, 95% CI .334-.536). Therefore, eHealth literacy partially mediated the relationship between active online health information seeking and shared decision-making, while it fully mediated the relationship between incidental online health information acquisition and shared decision-making. Conclusions: This study contributes to the ongoing development of health communication strategies and the modification of health information training programs for patients with diabetes. The need for the information industry to deliver accurate and easy-to-understand health information to the public to support their decision-making process and encourage positive health behaviors is urgent.

Indexed as

Decision MakingDecision Making, SharedDiabetes MellitusInformation Seeking BehaviorInternetAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDigital HealthDigital MediaFemaleHealth LiteracyHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Statesactive online health information seekingdiabetes mellituseHealth literacyhealth communicationincidental online health information acquisitiononline health information acquisitionshared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID42060934
PMCPMC13132485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.