Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42060809›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of pharmacology2026

Pharmacovigilance of paracetamol-induced Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis in the Indian population.

R S Ray, Ayushi Yadav, Shashi Bhushan, Jai Prakash, Rajeev Singh Raghuvanshi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

R S RayNational Coordination Centre for Pharmacovigilance Programme of India, Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Ayushi Yadav
Shashi Bhushan
Jai Prakash
Rajeev Singh Raghuvanshi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsDespite decades of proven safety of paracetamol, serious and rare reactions such as Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS) and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) often occur in the Indian population. The current study aimed to understand the safety profile of this relatively safer drug, paracetamol, with respect to rare and serious adverse events, SJS/TEN, based on data collected from the Indian population through the Pharmacovigilance Programme of India.

methodsThe collected, collated and analyzed all Individual Case Safety Reports with the use of paracetamol from the Indian population for the period January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2021, were reported to VigiBase and analyzed using the WHO database, VigiLyze.

resultsAnalysis of the reported data showed that 313 SJS/TEN adverse events were associated with the use of paracetamol. Disproportionality analysis of paracetamol-induced SJS/TEN reactions in the Indian population using the Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), reporting odds ratio, and the information component indicated higher risk of paracetamol in the Indian population.

conclusionsThe findings provide crucial insights into the extent of rare and infrequent SJS/TEN associated with the use of paracetamol in the Indian population. Owing to the seriousness of reaction and the widespread use of paracetamol for fever-like illness, the prescribing physicians, pharmacists, and other healthcare professionals should closely monitor patients administered paracetamol for this potential rare reaction, SJS/TEN.

Indexed as

AcetaminophenAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticPharmacovigilanceStevens-Johnson SyndromeAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultAcetaminophenAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticParacetamolpharmacovigilanceStevens–Johnson Syndrometoxic epidermal necrolysis

Identifiers

PMID42060809
PMCPMC13258291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.