Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42060803›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of pharmacology2026

Nutraceutical market in India: Thoughts on a right-based regulatory approach.

G Haripriya, P C Harigovind, Uma V Sankar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

G HaripriyaResearch Scholar, School of Legal Studies, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Kochi, Kerala, India.
P C HarigovindAssistant Professor, School of Legal Studies, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Uma V SankarResearch Administrator, Aster Medcity, Kochi, Kerala, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractThe nutraceuticals industry in India has witnessed strong growth, expanding at a CAGR of ~12%-15% in recent years (2020-2023), driven by rising health awareness, increasing disposable incomes, and demand for preventive healthcare. The market, valued at $8-10 billion in 2023, is expected to reach $18-20 billion by 2027, fueled by trends like immunity-boosting supplements, functional foods, and e-commerce penetration. However, the regulatory framework governing this sector remains complex. Nutraceuticals, which fall between food and pharmaceuticals, pose unique challenges regarding their quality, safety and effectiveness. In India, nutraceutical products are categorized as foods and are regulated by the Food Safety and Standards (FSS) Act, 2006. The FSS Authority of India is the primary regulatory body responsible for monitoring the manufacturing and marketing of nutraceuticals in India. Regardless of these efforts, there exists an uncertainty regarding the categorization of nutraceuticals. The main reason is with respect to their therapeutic effect and the form in which they are sold in the market. It closely resembles pharmaceutical products. With the global expansion of these products, it is imperative to ensure their quality and safety. This article critically analyses the current regulatory framework for nutraceuticals in India and also makes a comparative analysis of the regulation of nutraceuticals in various countries. The article also emphasizes the necessity for more rigorous regulation for the manufacturing and marketing of nutraceuticals to ensure the quality and safety of the products, thereby protecting public health.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsFood SafetyHumansIndiaLegislation, FoodHealth and safetyIndian nutraceutical marketnutraceuticalsnutrition and pharmaceuticalregulatory framework

Identifiers

PMID42060803
PMCPMC13258191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.