ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026
Quantifying direct genetic signal captured by principal component adjustment.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Contemporary genomic studies of complex traits, such as genome-wide association studies and polygenic index (PGI) analyses, frequently include the principal components of the genotype matrix (PCs) among their adjustments for population stratification. In this paper, we explore the extent to which we may be discounting direct genetic effects by adjusting for PCs. Using family-based models that control for parental genotype in the UK Biobank, we find that PCs capture direct genetic effects on all nine phenotypes we tested. These effects are generally small, and extremely similar to the population effects of the same PCs. This suggests that PC adjustment indeed diminishes, albeit very slightly, signals of direct genetic effects. Furthermore, we find that adjusting for PCs does not meaningfully alter estimates of the effect of the current PGIs within families. Our findings suggest that, for the phenotypes and populations studied here, direct genetic effects captured by PCs are modest, and adjusting for PCs does not seem to lead to meaningful attenuation in PGI estimates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.