ArticlePloS one2026
A multi-modal deep learning framework with GAN-based fusion for enhanced landslide detection.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The proposed work presents a hybrid deep learning framework that integrates four pre-trained Convolutional Neural Networks that include VGG16, DenseNet201, ResNet50 and InceptionV3. The pre-trained CNNs are combined with a GAN-based adversarial refinement module for accurate landslide detection and segmentation. Unlike traditional single-CNN or ensemble models, the proposed model performs multi-backbone feature fusion to accurately capture global level terrain context and fine-grained spatial details. The GAN component sharpens boundaries and suppresses noisy predictions through discriminator-guided refinement. The proposed system generates GIS-ready probability maps with confidence layers. They are also optimized for low-latency inference, making it suitable for rapid post-disaster decision support. The proposed work is evaluated on three benchmark datasets - CAS Landslide (high-resolution GF-2/UAV imagery), MS2LandsNet (medium-resolution Sentinel-2) and GDCLD (coseismic landslides). The proposed framework achieves F1-scores of 97.24%, 93.70% and 94.75% across the three datasets. These results correspond to improvements of 1.4 to 2.9% over fusion baselines and 4-7% over single-CNN models such as VGG16, DenseNet201,ResNet50 andInceptionV3. The results highlight consistent IoU gains and improved boundary delineation. The cross-dataset experiments further demonstrate strong generalization across varying resolutions, terrain types and triggering mechanisms. To our knowledge, this is the first landslide segmentation study to combine multi-backbone feature fusion with adversarial mask refinement in an operational monitoring context. The results confirm that the proposed framework delivers high accuracy, scalability and deployment readiness making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.