Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42060696›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

The cost of dual-task walking: Cognitive demands restrict gaze behaviour and gait planning.

Yuri Russo, Jiaxi Ye, Sarah E Lamb, Amy Gear, William Lyon, Jinying Qiu, Millie Banks, Emily Martin, Zijing Wang, Maha Alghamdi and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yuri RussoDepartment of Public Health & Sport Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1025-6734
Jiaxi YeDepartment of Public Health & Sport Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Sarah E LambDepartment of Public Health & Sport Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4349-7195
Amy GearDepartment of Public Health & Sport Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
William LyonDepartment of Public Health & Sport Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Jinying QiuDepartment of Public Health & Sport Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Millie BanksDepartment of Public Health & Sport Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Emily MartinDepartment of Public Health & Sport Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Zijing WangDepartment of Public Health & Sport Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Maha AlghamdiDepartment of Public Health & Sport Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Phaedra LeveridgeDepartment of Public Health & Sport Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3602-2231
William R YoungDepartment of Public Health & Sport Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adaptive walking relies on proactive gaze behaviour to plan foot placement and maintain stability. This study examined how mental workload and task complexity affect gaze behaviour and gait biomechanics during a precision target-stepping task in healthy young adults. We also quantified the frequency of cross-stepping during the experimental task. Twenty-three participants (18-23 years) walked along an L-shaped pathway containing raised stepping targets under single-task (ST) and dual-task (DT) conditions. Targets had four different layouts to create high and low difficulty conditions. Eye movements were recorded using mobile eye-tracking, and gait kinematics were recorded via motion capture. Compared with ST, DT walking produced slower walking speeds, longer stance times, and reduced velocity between stepping targets, indicating a more inefficient gait strategy. In addition, eye-tracking analyses revealed fewer and shorter fixations on task-relevant targets and a greater number of fixations directed toward task-irrelevant areas and, saccadic amplitudes were reduced despite increased outside fixations, suggesting a breakdown in visual exploration between proximal and distal regions of the walkway. In ST conditions, cross-stepping was more frequent than in DT. These findings indicate that increased mental workload compromises proactive gaze behaviour, likely through working-memory and attentional limitations that disrupt feedforward gait planning. Contrary to expectation, cross-stepping occurred more often during ST than DT walking, suggesting that in this population cross-stepping may not be a maladaptive strategy. Overall, these results highlight the cognitive demands of adaptive walking even in young, low-risk individuals and underscore the importance of preserving visual-motor coordination under cognitive stress.

Indexed as

CognitionFixation, OcularGaitWalkingAdolescentBiomechanical PhenomenaDual-Task TestsEye MovementsEye-Tracking TechnologyFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42060696
PMCPMC13132448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.