Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42060695›Full record

ArticlePLOS mental health2026

A chain mediation analysis of the effects of psychological inflexibility, perception of threat, and behavioral adherence among refugees during crisis: The case of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Martin Mabunda Baluku

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Martin Mabunda BalukuDepartment of Educational, Social, and Organizational Psychology, School of Psychology, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7843-9203

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Without known medications or vaccines for COVID-19, governments worldwide adopted the World Health Organization's (WHO) preventive guidelines, which primarily focused on regulating physical and social interactions. Although the control measures effectively slowed the spread of the virus, their uptake in refugee settlements was hindered by the challenging living conditions within these settlements. This study examines the correlation of psychological factors, including psychological inflexibility, avoidance coping, perceived threat, and psychological trauma symptoms, with the uptake of COVID-19 preventive behavioral measures. It was hypothesized that avoidance coping, psychological trauma symptoms, and perceived threat mediate the association between psychological inflexibility and non-adherence. These assumptions were tested using data from 387 refugees from two large refugee settlements in Uganda. The results showed support for the hypothesized serial double mediation model. Overall, the results suggest that decreasing psychological inflexibility and consequently fostering adaptive coping could be essential for diminishing psychological trauma symptoms and stimulating accurate perception of risks and threats posed by crises and disasters, thus reducing non-adherence to preventive measures.

Identifiers

PMID42060695
PMCPMC13132436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.