ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
Evaluating the utility of amino acid similarity-aware kmers to represent TCR repertoires for classification.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine Learning of Personal Repertoires From Public T Cell Receptors.Immunological reviews · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Insights gained through interpretation of models trained on the T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoire contribute to advances in understanding of immune-mediated disease. This has the potential to improve diagnostic tests and treatments, particularly for autoimmune diseases. However, TCR repertoire datasets with samples from donors of known autoimmune disease status generally include orders of magnitude fewer samples than TCR sequences. Promising TCR repertoire classification approaches consider relationships between non-identical TCR sequences. In particular, kmer methods demonstrate strong and stable performance for small datasets. We propose a TCR repertoire representation that considers the relationships between amino acids within kmers flexibly and efficiently. XGBoost and logistic regression models are trained and tested on kmer representations of TCR repertoire datasets including samples from patients with coeliac disease as well as donors with previous cytomegalovirus infection. XGBoost models outperform logistic regression, indicating that interactions may be crucial for discriminative ability. We find that a reduced alphabet based on BLOSUM62 can lead to a model with slightly stronger XGBoost testing performance than other kmer features. Though it remains unclear whether there is an amino acid encoding that can substantially improve TCR repertoire classification with reduced alphabet kmers, evidence that this representation enables faster training of XGBoost models in comparison to kmer clusters suggests that our reduced alphabet approach permits wider exploration of amino acid similarity in practice. Finally, we detail motifs which are important in each top-performing XGBoost model and compare them to TCR sequences previously associated with each immune status. We highlight the challenge of interpreting non-linear TCR repertoire classification models trained on kmers which, if overcome, could lead to biomarker discovery for autoimmune diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.