ArticlePloS one2026
Enhancing the forecast accuracy of the daily number of patients arrivals in emergency department by hybrid ARIMAX-ANN algorithm.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Spatially varying coefficient generalized distributed lag models for binary response with MCEM estimation.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate forecasting of daily arrivals in Emergency Departments (ED) is crucial for healthcare providers. This study incorporates a variety of factors, including meteorological and calendar influences, into the forecasting of ED patient arrivals. Due to the complex linear and nonlinear associations these factors have with ED arrivals, two hybrid algorithms were developing to enhance forecasting accuracy. These algorithms combine Auto-Regressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) with Artificial Neural Network (ANN) methodologies, leveraging their strengths in handling linear and nonlinear relationships in patient arrival data. The first hybrid algorithm utilizes an ANN model with inputs comprising ARIMA-fitted values of the time series, ANN-fitted values of the ARIMA residuals, and ANN-fitted values of the time series, excluding nonlinear input features from ARIMA. The second hybrid approach combines ARIMA and ANN forecast values of the time series. Robust performance metrics were employ to validate the effectiveness of these hybrid algorithms, allowing for a clear comparison with standalone ARIMA, ANN, LSTM, and GLM forecasts at short, intermediate, long, and overall horizons. The overall accuracy indices for ARIMA, ANN, hybrid1, hybrid2, LSTM and GLM algorithms are RMSE = 37.43, 44.33, 39.33, 33.82, 55.53 and 34.96; ME = -16.38, 22.08, 13.93, 2.85, -36.24 and 5.65; SMAPE = 5.32, 6.57, 6.00, 5.18, 8.27, and 4.62, respectively. The hybrid2 algorithm demonstrates superior performance across short, intermediate, and overall horizons, while the ARIMAX model excels in long horizons characterized by low volatility. Although hybrid1 and ANN exhibit similar overall accuracy, the hybrid2 algorithm enhances accuracy indices specifically in the intermediate horizon, which is marked by high volatility. These findings significantly improve the predictive capabilities of existing algorithms and provide valuable insights for strategic decision-making in managing patient flow in emergency departments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.