ArticlePloS one2026
How does law and policy support providers of NHS healthcare in England to respond to harm experienced by patients during the course of their treatment and care: A scoping review.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMany countries have implemented laws and policies to help healthcare providers address patient harm. However, there is limited research on their effectiveness, especially in the context of England#39;s National Health Service (NHS). This scoping review asks: How does law and policy support NHS healthcare providers in England respond to harm?. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A scoping review methodology was applied to map and summarise the literature to date. MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Westlaw were searched to identify potentially relevant literature that had been published between 2000 and 2025. Literature was included if it addressed care delivery in England#39;s NHS and healthcare providers' responses to patient harm. Two reviewers independently screened the literature identified from the search against the eligibility criteria. A grey literature search of the citations within the included records was then conducted to identify relevant law and policy that supports providers of NHS healthcare in England to respond to patient harm. A total of 121 records were reviewed: 63 peer-reviewed and 58 pieces of grey literature. Data were charted using a standardised data extraction form. Themes were developed through a combination of thematic and content analysis, then presented as a narrative synthesis.
conclusionThe first of its kind, this scoping review identified English laws and policies that support NHS healthcare providers in England to respond to patient harm. It revealed the incongruent yet interdependent relationship that exists between England's legal systems, healthcare policies and the promoted NHS values. The scoping review highlighted how organisational culture can overshadow law and policy and be the defining factor in how providers of NHS healthcare in England respond to patient harm. The impact of law and policy in curating organisational culture and response to patient harm is an area requiring further research. ETHICS: Ethics approval was not required for this review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.