ArticlePloS one2026
Revolutionizing nanosatellites' data integrity with SEEnet: A real-time ensemble learning approach for Single-Event Effect (SEE) prediction.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As nanosatellites make access to space more affordable and widespread, protecting onboard data from radiation-related damage has become a major challenge for modern low-cost missions. These small satellites often rely on commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) electronic components, which are particularly vulnerable to radiation-induced Single-Event Effects (SEEs) that can disrupt system operation and compromise mission data integrity. To address this challenge, our study proposes SEEnet, a lightweight ensemble learning framework designed for real-time prediction of SEE occurrence in nanosatellite systems. SEEnet combines multiple decision-tree classifiers with varying model depths using a soft-voting strategy, allowing it to improve prediction reliability while maintaining low computational complexity suitable for resource-constrained onboard environments. Our proposed approach is evaluated using a publicly available dataset from the Institute of Space Systems, University of Stuttgart, describing satellite spatial characteristics and associated SEE events. Experimental results show that SEEnet achieves a classification accuracy of 77%, outperforming several baseline machine-learning models, including Support Vector Machines, Random Forests, and Gradient Boosting, under the same evaluation conditions. In addition, the model demonstrates balanced precision-recall performance and provides bootstrap-based uncertainty estimates, enhancing confidence in its predictions. Overall, the results indicate that SEEnet offers an effective and computationally efficient solution for early SEE risk assessment, supporting proactive fault mitigation and improved data reliability in real-time nanosatellite missions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.