ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026
Characteristics of Patients Accessing Outpatient Oncology Services Virtually and Predictors of Subsequent Unplanned Emergency Department Presentations in 78,323 Adults in Australia: Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Unplanned health service utilisation among people living with cancer and mental health conditions: A retrospective matched case-comparison study in Australia.The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Virtual care has become increasingly integrated into oncology services since the COVID-19 pandemic, yet little is known about which patients use it most and how its use is associated with unplanned emergency care among people living with cancer. Objective: The study aims to identify sociodemographic and clinical predictors of virtual care use among patients accessing outpatient oncology services and quantify their association with unplanned emergency department (ED) visits. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using linked administrative health data for 78,323 adults with cancer who accessed outpatient oncology services in Victoria and Queensland, Australia, between January 2018 and December 2020, with a 1-year follow-up. Virtual care use and unplanned ED visits were categorized as none, low (1-3), or high (≥4), and analyzed using modified Poisson models with robust variance estimation, adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical factors. Results: Out of 78,323 patients, 37,706 (48.1%) did not use virtual care (only in-person), 24,196 (30.9%) had low use, and 16,421 (20.9%) were high users. Higher virtual care use was associated with rural (vs urban) residence (relative risk [RR] 1.23, 95% CI 1.19-1.28), mental health disorders (vs none; RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.24-1.33), Charlson comorbidities (vs none; RR 1.12, 95% CI 1.09-1.28), and receiving care during the COVID-19 pandemic (vs nonpandemic period; RR 3.03, 95% CI 2.92-3.15). In contrast, older age (≥75 y vs 18-44 y; RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.74-0.83) and being born overseas (vs Australia; RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.80-0.86) were associated with lower virtual care use. High virtual care use (vs none) was associated with an increased risk of ≥4 unplanned ED visits (RR 2.64, 95% CI 2.52-2.79). Conclusions: The use of virtual outpatient oncology services varied based on patients' demographic and clinical characteristics. Higher virtual outpatient use was associated with increased unplanned ED presentations. Further research using causal analytic approaches is needed to clarify the relationship between virtual care and unplanned acute care use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.