ArticlePloS one2026
Enhancing user perception and drone flight control through AR-based object projection.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explores the question: "Can changing the appearance of drones through AR influence user operational behavior and impressions of drones?" To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to empirically examine the influence of AR-based appearance modification of drones on user perception and operational behavior. To investigate this, a method is proposed to modify the appearance of drones by projecting objects onto them using Augmented Reality (AR), and its effects are evaluated through subjective experiments involving a relatively large number of participants. Data for drone operation and survey responses are collected from participants and analyzed using factor analysis. The factor scores are then compared between the conditions with and without AR-based appearance modification. The results do not indicate significant differences in factors related to the number of operations, suggesting consistency in this aspect. However, significant differences are observed in factors related to appearance and social evaluation (age, animal likeness, gender), as well as in physical characteristics (e.g., size, weight) of drones. In addition, open-ended survey responses reveal notable differences in appearance assessment. These findings demonstrate the potential of this method to improve the social acceptance of drone technology, particularly in the context of this research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.