Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42060628›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Mechanistic modelling of highly pathogenic avian influenza: A scoping review revealing critical gaps in cross-species transmission models.

Manting Wang, Elda K E Laison, Tanya Philippsen, Sajjad Ghaemi, Juxin Liu, Iain Moyles, Anthony Signore, Junling Ma, Bouchra Nasri

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Manting WangDépartement de Médecine Sociale et Préventive, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Elda K E LaisonDépartement de Médecine Sociale et Préventive, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Tanya PhilippsenDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Sajjad GhaemiDigital Technologies Research Centre, National Research Council Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Juxin LiuDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Iain MoylesDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Anthony SignoreCanadian Food Inspection Agency (Western Area), Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Junling MaDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0197-2317
Bouchra NasriDépartement de Médecine Sociale et Préventive, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6334-3105

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHighly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) viruses, particularly subtypes such as H5N1 and H7N9, have caused widespread outbreaks in wild birds, poultry, livestock and occasionally humans, raising concerns about cross-species transmission and pandemic potential. Effective control and surveillance strategies require a thorough understanding of HPAI transmission dynamics, which can be supported by mathematical modelling.

objectiveThis scoping review aimed to identify mechanistic models used to study HPAI transmission. Specifically, we sought to categorize model types, describe their application contexts (e.g., wild birds, poultry, livestock, and humans), and highlight modelling gaps relevant to understanding and mitigating the risks of HPAI spread.

methodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines and the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR), we conducted systematic searches of PubMed and Web of Science to identify peer-reviewed studies employing deterministic and stochastic models to analyze HPAI transmission. Eligible articles published between January 2023 and June 2025 were screened and grouped by model structure, host populations, transmission pathways, and modelling objectives.

resultsAfter screening, 30 studies published after 2023 were included in this scoping review. Compartmental models were the most common (26 studies), with 16 deterministic and 10 stochastic approaches. These models were primarily used to describe transmission among wild birds, poultry, livestock, and humans and to evaluate interventions such as culling, vaccination, and movement restrictions. Agent-based models (2 studies) captured individual-level interactions and spatial heterogeneity, while network models (2 studies) represented contact structures and transmission pathways between farms or species.

conclusionsCurrently, mechanistic modelling of HPAI is dominated by compartmental approaches, including both deterministic and stochastic formulations, whereas agent-based and network models remain relatively underused. Although most studies focus on transmission in wild birds and poultry, and in some cases spillover infections to humans, few explicitly examine infection dynamics in livestock or in transmission between livestock and humans, despite the importance of livestock (e.g., cattle) as potential intermediaries in human infection. Key gaps persist in the integration of empirical data, representation of multi-host interactions, and evaluation of realistic intervention strategies. Addressing these limitations is essential to improve predictive accuracy and to strengthen the role of modelling in informing HPAI surveillance and control.

Indexed as

Influenza, HumanInfluenza in BirdsAnimalsAnimals, WildBirdsDisease OutbreaksHumansInfluenza A Virus, H5N1 SubtypeInfluenza A Virus, H7N9 SubtypeLivestockModels, BiologicalModels, TheoreticalPoultry

Identifiers

PMID42060628
PMCPMC13132250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.