ArticleDigestion2026
Impact of Constipation on Quality of Life, Work Productivity, and Treatment Practices: Findings from the CONNECT Web-Based Survey.
Article in Digestion, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionConstipation is a common gastrointestinal disorder that negatively affects quality of life (QOL), work productivity, and long-term prognosis. The aim of this study was to examine the associations between constipation severity and Short Form-8 Health Survey (SF-8) and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) scores, as well as treatment status and patient preferences, through a large-scale survey of the general population.
methodsA web-based questionnaire was administered to 2,300 Japanese adults with constipation symptoms using a large survey panel. The survey assessed the Constipation Scoring System (CSS), Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS), SF-8, WPAI, treatment status, and preferences for treatment methods.
resultsCSS scores showed significant negative correlations with the SF-8 Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores and significant positive correlations with WPAI scores (p < 0.05). Both SF-8 and WPAI scores differed significantly across BSFS categories, with normal stool forms associated with better outcomes (p < 0.05). Only 22.0% of participants received prescription medication for constipation. The most common reason for not seeking medical care was "inconvenience of visiting a medical institution" (65.6%). Regarding treatment preferences, 80.8% preferred tablet formulations, and once-daily administration at bedtime was the most favored dosing schedule (56.7%), followed by before breakfast (30.0%).
conclusionConstipation severity and stool form are associated with QOL and work productivity, underscoring the importance of appropriate treatment strategies. Patient preference should also be considered when selecting therapeutic options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.