ArticleJournal of behavioral addictions2026
Gaming disorder and compensation-based gaming motivations: A longitudinal study of emerging adults.
Article in Journal of behavioral addictions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gaming motivations are central to understanding why individuals engage in video games and why some develop problematic patterns. However, while longitudinal studies are emerging, cross-sectional work still predominates, leaving dynamic processes underexplored. This study examined how gratification- and compensation-related gaming motivations predict the development of Gaming Disorder (GD) among emerging adults. Methods: We conducted a three-wave, pre-registered longitudinal survey with 438 emerging adults, each wave spaced three months apart. GD severity was measured with the IGDS9-SF, and motivations (Coping, Escape, Fantasy, Identity, Introjected Regulation) were assessed using the Gaming Motivation Inventory. Cross-lagged panel models (CLPM) and random-intercept CLPM (RI-CLPM) were employed to separate between-person stability from within-person dynamics. Results: Concurrent associations showed that all motivations correlated positively with GD severity at each wave. Longitudinally, compensation-related motivations (Coping and Escape) demonstrated delayed reciprocal effects with GD: earlier motivations predicted later GD, and GD subsequently reinforced these motivations. Introjected Regulation showed reciprocal effects in CLPM but not in RI-CLPM, suggesting that they reflected between-person differences rather than within-person change. Gratification-related motivations (Fantasy and Identity) did not predict GD over time. Discussion: Findings highlight the dynamic interplay between compensation motivations and GD, consistent with theories emphasizing a shift from gratification to compensation as disorder develops. However, gratification motivations appear to function primarily as common entry points into gaming rather than predictors of disorder. These results underscore the need for longitudinal investigations with sufficient temporal depth to capture how motivational changes interact with contextual and individual factors in the escalation of GD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.