Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42060350›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of ophthalmology2026

Optimizing the invisible costs of anti-VEGF: The road to regularity.

Surbhi Agrawal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Surbhi AgrawalDepartment of Ophthalmology, Swami Vivekananda Charitable Hospital, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy has transformed outcomes in retinal disease, but its benefits depend on early initiation and sustained regular treatment. In India, poor adherence is often attributed to drug cost alone; however, the invisible indirect costs of care may be equally important. These include repeated hospital visits, transport expenses, loss of wages, caregiver burden, domestic responsibilities, administrative delays, and medico-legal practices that increase pre-procedure testing and paperwork. This perspective highlights "visit burden" as an under-recognized barrier to regularity and argues that improving compliance requires redesigning care around the patient's real-life circumstances. Practical strategies include insurance approval of treatment plans rather than individual injections, rationalizing pre-procedure investigations, enabling same-day injections, avoiding unnecessary post-injection antibiotics, adopting protocols that reduce visit frequency such as treat-and-extend, and scheduling follow-up visits precisely with reminders. Post-injection reviews should be purposeful and evidence-based rather than routine. Real-world anti-VEGF outcomes will improve not only by choosing the right drug, but by delivering treatment in a way that patients can realistically continue.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsCost of IllnessRetinal DiseasesVascular Endothelial Growth Factor ADrug CostsHumansIndiaIntravitreal InjectionsMedication AdherenceOffice VisitsReferral and ConsultationSick LeaveTomography, Optical CoherenceAngiogenesis InhibitorsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AadherenceAnti-VEGFIndiaindirect costsintravitreal injectionretinal disease

Identifiers

PMID42060350
PMCPMC13225316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.