ArticleJournal of global health2026
A district-based health facility assessment for maternal and newborn care across Pakistan.
Article in Journal of global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The shift from home to facility births has not translated into substantial mortality reduction in Pakistan. Therefore, we assessed whether health care facilities (HCFs) offer or have the capacity to offer critical maternal and newborn interventions. We aimed to propose tailored facility-based maternal and newborn care strategies, especially for the perinatal period. Methods: We conducted an HCF assessment in 275 public and private HCFs across 141 districts of Pakistan. We employed a comprehensive, quantitative tool to assess the availability and readiness of resources needed for critical maternal and newborn interventions, including Basic Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care, Comprehensive Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care signal functions, and Every Newborn Action Plan interventions. We analysed the data using Stata, version 13.0. Results: A high proportion of facilities offered delivery services (93%), yet lacked specialised staff, especially paediatric surgeons (18%) and neonatologists (18.5%). Availability of neonatal nurses was also critically low, especially in Balochistan (19.4%) and Gilgit-Baltistan (22.2%). Clinical guidelines, especially for newborn resuscitation (8.8%), kangaroo mother care (KMC) (8.4%), and use of injectable antibiotics (10.9%), were largely unavailable. Notable regional disparities were observed, with Balochistan displaying the poorest service availability and readiness. Only 8.3% of facilities in Balochistan had newborn resuscitation equipment, and none had guidelines. Conclusions: To make a substantial impact on reducing maternal and newborn mortality, data-driven, equitable allocation of funds and resources to HCFs is crucial. The availability of skilled health care providers, basic newborn care, and low-cost, high-impact interventions, such as the optimal use of antenatal corticosteroids, KMC, newborn resuscitation, and injectable antibiotics, should be prioritised and scaled up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.