ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2026
Incidence and duration of hospital-initiated opioids, benzodiazepines and antipsychotics: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMany patients receive temporarily indicated medications, such as opioids, benzodiazepines, and antipsychotics (potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) of interest) in hospitals. This could result in PIM use thereafter, when medication is continued.
aimThis study aimed to investigate the incidence and duration of hospital-initiated PIM use.
methodThis retrospective cohort study included patients aged ≥ 18 years who visited a Dutch teaching hospital between January 2019-May 2023 and received a new prescription for an opioid, benzodiazepine, or antipsychotic initiated at discharge or outpatient visit and continued thereafter. Patients were followed for one year using data from the hospital's information system and community pharmacy dispensing records. The primary outcomes were the incidence of PIMs of interest and duration of use. Secondary outcomes included duration of PIM use across age categories and the proportion of prescriptions classified as actually inappropriate medication based on the documented indications in a subset of patients. Descriptive data analysis was used. Chi-square tests were used to assess differences between age categories and duration of continued use.
resultsAmong 6,835 patients with a new prescription of one of the medications, 82.7% were prescribed and dispensed an opioid (n = 5,652, mean age 61.1 years, 57.3% female), 14.7% a benzodiazepine (n = 1,005, mean age 60.7 years, 53.3% female) and 2.6% an antipsychotic (n = 178, mean age 69.2 years, 48.9% female). A significant proportion used the medication > 182 days following the hospital visit (13.4% opioids, 20.9% benzodiazepine, 36.0% of antipsychotics). PIMs were not more frequently discontinued in older adults. Among 156 randomly evaluated prescriptions, a clear justification for continued use was often lacking, mainly for benzodiazepines (83.1%) and opioids (76.0%).
conclusionPotentially temporarily indicated medications were often continued following a hospital visit without justification for continued use. These results highlight the importance of carefully assessing the timely discontinuation or specifying a discontinuation date for PIMs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.