Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42060213›Full record

ArticleDiabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders2026

Quality of Life and Humanistic Burden of Adults with Type 1 Diabetes with Recurrent Severe Hypoglycemic Events and Impaired Awareness of Hypoglycemia Using a Continuous Glucose Monitor.

Adriana Boateng-Kuffour, Caitlin S Kelly, Huyen T Nguyen, Nanxin Li, Keval Chandarana, Katherine S Chapman, Liang Chen, Emilee M Cornelius, Wendy A Wolf, Beth Barber and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Adriana Boateng-KuffourHealth Economics and Outcomes Research, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, 50 Northern Avenue, Boston, MA, 02210, USA. adriana_boateng-kuffour@vrtx.com.
Caitlin S KellyT1D Exchange, Boston, MA, USA.
Huyen T NguyenT1D Exchange, Boston, MA, USA.
Nanxin LiHealth Economics and Outcomes Research, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, 50 Northern Avenue, Boston, MA, 02210, USA.
Keval ChandaranaHealth Economics and Outcomes Research, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, 50 Northern Avenue, Boston, MA, 02210, USA.
Katherine S ChapmanT1D Exchange, Boston, MA, USA.
Liang ChenHealth Economics and Outcomes Research, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, 50 Northern Avenue, Boston, MA, 02210, USA.
Emilee M CorneliusT1D Exchange, Boston, MA, USA.
Wendy A WolfT1D Exchange, Boston, MA, USA.
Beth BarberHealth Economics and Outcomes Research, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, 50 Northern Avenue, Boston, MA, 02210, USA.
William H PolonskyBehavioral Diabetes Institute, San Diego, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study aimed to examine psychosocial well-being, quality of life (QoL), and productivity in people with type 1 diabetes (pwT1D) who were experiencing recurrent severe hypoglycemic events (SHEs) and impaired awareness of hypoglycemia (IAH), despite using continuous glucose monitors (CGMs).

methodsThe study utilized a cross-sectional, observational design which incorporated an online survey about SHE experiences, diabetes-related complications, psychosocial burden, QoL, and productivity in a sample of adult pwT1D who use CGM in the United States. Participants completed measures of IAH status (modified Gold score ≥ 4 = IAH), diabetes distress (DDS-17), fear of hypoglycemia (HFS-II), QoL (DIDP and EQ-5D-5L), and productivity (DPM). Participants were categorized into two cohorts based on self-reported history of SHEs and IAH: the cohort of recurrent SHE [≥ 2 SHEs in the past 12 months] with IAH, and the cohort of No SHE and No IAH to provide context. Unadjusted comparisons (Welch's t test, Pearson's chi-squared test) were conducted to describe differences across cohorts.

resultsIn this US study population of adult CGM users, the recurrent SHE (≥ 2) with IAH cohort included 174 participants, and the No SHE and No IAH cohort included 689 participants. On average, participants with recurrent SHEs and IAH reported 8.6 SHEs in the past year. Compared to those with No SHE and No IAH, those with recurrent SHEs and IAH had a higher psychosocial burden (fear of hypoglycemia and diabetes distress), lower QoL, worse overall health status, and reduced productivity (all p < 0.001).

conclusionsDespite using CGM, adults with T1D with recurrent SHEs and IAH experienced lower psychosocial well-being, QoL, and reduced productivity compared to adults with T1D with no SHEs and no IAH, highlighting the unmet need for novel therapies for this group.

Indexed as

Patient-reported outcomesPsychosocial burdenQuality of lifeRecurrent hypoglycemic eventsType 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID42060213
PMCPMC13253896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.