Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42060180›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2026

Trajectory and Predictors of Return-to-Work Outcomes for People After a Road Traffic Injury: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Masoumeh Abedi, Tammy Aplin, Elise Gane, Venerina Johnston

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Masoumeh AbediSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. mabedi@usc.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1844-5844
Tammy AplinSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8412-3208
Elise GaneSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5901-3899
Venerina JohnstonSchool of Health, Psychological and Medical Sciences, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0911-0866

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIdentifying factors influencing work after road traffic injuries (RTI) is important for developing early and appropriate interventions. This study aimed to quantify vocational outcomes up to 12 months after RTIs; to explore Return-to-work (RTW) trajectories over this period; and to identify predictors of RTW status and disability days at baseline, 6-, and 12-month post-RTI.

methodsIndividuals aged 18 to 64 years with minor to serious musculoskeletal RTI presenting to two Australian public hospital emergency departments were recruited. Exclusions were severe injury and not being in paid employment pre-injury. Assessment occurred at baseline, six months, and 12 months post-RTI.

resultsSixty-three participants completed the baseline survey. By 12 months, 88% had returned to work, mostly with work modifications, whilst 13% experienced at least one RTW failure. Mean disability days were 48 (SD = 93). Predictors of RTW at baseline were lower injury severity, less pain/disability, and younger age (R

conclusionRTW after RTI is a dynamic, staged process. Early outcomes are primarily health-related, whereas 6-12-month outcomes are shaped by psychosocial factors. Sustained RTW often requires work modifications, underscoring the need for coordinated, systems-based rehabilitation strategies.

Indexed as

DisabilityLongitudinal cohort studyReturn to workTraffic accidents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.