Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42060149›Full record

ArticleAmbio2026

Stakeholder perceptions of forest disturbance drivers and management responses are aligned in Central Europe.

Michaela Perunová, Roman Modlinger, Vilém Jarský, Tomáš Hlásny

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michaela PerunováFaculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00, Prague 6 -Suchdol, Czech Republic.
Roman ModlingerFaculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00, Prague 6 -Suchdol, Czech Republic.
Vilém JarskýFaculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00, Prague 6 -Suchdol, Czech Republic.
Tomáš HlásnyFaculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00, Prague 6 -Suchdol, Czech Republic. hlasny@fld.czu.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9771-7435

Funding

Národní Agentura pro Zemědělský Výzkum QK23020039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forest disturbances are increasingly understood as social-ecological phenomena involving diverse actors. Here, we focused on one of the Europe's largest recent disturbances-the drought-triggered bark beetle outbreak in Central Europe (2017-2022). Based on a survey of 165 respondents, we examined perceived disturbance drivers, response actions, and the alignment between them as an indicator of a value-action gap that is often present in social-ecological and governance systems. Climatic and forest structure-related factors were identified as the dominant drivers, aligning with current scientific understanding, whereas socio-economic and management constraints were perceived as less influential. Reported responses reflected awareness of climate-change risks and involved workforce training, adaptive change in species composition, and water-retention measures. Cause-action alignment was observed in nearly half of respondents, particularly among managers and legal entities. We found a relatively sound understanding of disturbance causes and corresponding responses, likely shaped by recent experience with an unprecedented disturbance impact.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeConservation of Natural ResourcesForestryForestsAnimalsColeopteraDroughtsEuropeHumansPerceptionSurveys and QuestionnairesClimate-change adaptationForest disturbance perceptionQuestionnaire-based surveySocial-ecological systemsValue-action gap

Identifiers

PMID42060149
PMCPMC13661826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.