Observational studySupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Identifying person-level factors to guide digital mental health treatments for cancer survivors: an ecological momentary assessment study.
Observational study in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Medical Appointments are Associated With Same-Day Worry and Sleep Difficulties Among Cancer Survivors.Psycho-oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe growing population of cancer survivors in the US highlights the need for adaptive digital mental health treatments that can help address a large gap in mental health treatment. Although just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) hold promise for improving mental health outcomes, none have been developed specifically for cancer survivors, in part due to their complexity. The purpose of this study was to identify survivor-level factors that could inform the development and optimization of adaptive treatments aimed at improving affective outcomes in this population.
methodsA total of 426 adults diagnosed with cancer within the past five years participated in a 5-week observational study. Participants completed smartphone-based surveys three times per day assessing momentary affect, affective forecasting, emotion regulation attempts, social interaction quality, pain, and sleep duration from the previous night. Linear mixed-effects models were conducted at the momentary level to examine associations with positive affect (PA) and negative affect (NA).
resultsHigher momentary PA was associated with longer sleep duration the previous night, lower pain, fewer emotion regulation attempts, higher-quality social interactions, and forecasting one's future affect as more positive. In contrast, higher momentary NA was associated with shorter sleep duration the previous night, greater pain, more frequent emotion regulation attempts, poorer-quality social interactions, and forecasting one's future affect as more negative.
conclusionThese findings identify several modifiable meta-emotion and psychosocial factors that may serve as promising targets for future JITAIs designed to improve affective well-being among cancer survivors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.