ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2026
[Science and practice in public health services: experiences from Saxony-Anhalt and perspectives for sustainable public health services].
Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Against the backdrop of the Pact for the Public Health Service (Pakt für den Öffentlichen Gesundheitsdienst; Pakt ÖGD), the commitment to evidence-informed practice is increasingly shaping the strategic development of Germany's Public Health Service (ÖGD). Particularly at the municipal and federal state levels, closer collaboration between research and public health practice is needed. In Saxony-Anhalt, a cooperation agreement was concluded in 2024 between the City of Magdeburg and Magdeburg University Medicine (UMMD) to institutionally strengthen their existing collaboration. In the same year, a project agreement involving additional public health stakeholders was established to create a sustainable framework for systematic exchange between academia and public health administration.This article presents ongoing collaborative initiatives in Saxony-Anhalt, including projects on the analysis of school entry examinations, in-depth evaluations of Early Childhood Intervention Services (Frühe Hilfen), e‑mental health interventions for children and adolescents, and the public health response to Mpox. These examples illustrate how regional cooperation between academia and practice can be operationalized and highlight the opportunities such collaborations offer for the continued development of the Public Health Service. In addition, knowledge translation formats such as regular coordination meetings, scientific events, and practice-oriented training play a key role in facilitating the transfer of evidence into public health practice.The experiences from Saxony-Anhalt are consistent with the recommendations of the Advisory Board of the Pakt ÖGD, which has called, among other measures, for the establishment of teaching and research public health offices, bridge professorships, and sustainable funding structures. The examples of collaboration demonstrate that the future-oriented development of the Public Health Service requires both local innovation and supra-regional structures that systematically connect science and practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.